English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND Training deep learning algorithms requires large amounts of data, which is a significant challenge in the medical domain, and particularly in neuro-oncology, where ample data can only be found in multi-institutional collaborations. The current paradigm for multi-institutional collaborations is based on pooled datasets that has always faced privacy, legal, technical, and data-ownership concerns. In this study we evaluate the hypothesis that federated learning can provide a method to overcome these concerns and facilitate a shift in the paradigm of multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. We attempt to investigate this hypothesis in a feasibility study of automatically delineating the glioblastoma extent in T2-FLAIR scans. METHODS We identified a retrospective cohort of 165 glioblastoma patients with available clinically acquired pre-operative multi-parametric structural MRI (mpMRI) scans (i.e., T1, T1Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR), with corresponding expert tumor boundary annotations, from 10 independent institutions. We implemented a 3D deep learning algorithm (3D-UNet) to predict the boundaries of the whole tumor extent, by virtue of the abnormal hyper-intense signal of T2-FLAIR scans. We compare the performance of this 3D-UNet model resulting from federated learning with the performance of the same 3D-UNet model generated by sharing data to a single location where centralized/traditional training occurs. RESULTS Our quantitative results on federated learning (Dice:85.2%) across individual contributions from the 10 institutions demonstrate final model quality reaching 99% of the model quality achieved by sharing data (Dice:86.2%). CONCLUSIONS Translation and adoption of federated learning in a clinical configuration for multi-institutional collaborations is expected to have a catalytic impact towards precision and personalized medicine. The performance of computer-aided analytics and assistive diagnostics is expected to see a precipitous rise, as new models are trained on datasets of unprecedented size through such data-private collaborations.

NIMG-68. FEDERATED LEARNING IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY FOR MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATIONS WITHOUT SHARING PATIENT DATA