English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND Clinical benefit of continuing bevacizumab beyond progression is unknown in glioblastomas. A biomarker analysis of the AVAglio trial suggested that proneural subtype of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients may receive an OS benefit from a first-line bevacizumab. This study explored biomarkers that may predict survival of glioblastoma patients treated with concurrent irradiation, temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) followed by BEV beyond progression (BBP). METHODS In the primary protocol, newly diagnosed GBM patients aged 20–75 received concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m2, D1-42), irradiation (2 Gy x 5 QW x6) and BEV (10 mg/kg Q2W x 3) followed by ≤12 4-week cycles of TMZ (150–200 mg/m2, D1-5) plus BEV (10 mg/kg, D1 and 15) and then 2 or 3-week cycles of BEV monotherapy (15 or 10 mg/kg). Upon PD/recurrence during the primary protocol, the patients were subjected to the secondary protocol with 2-3-week cycles of BEV monotherapy with or without other chemotherapeutic agents (BBP). The primary endpoint was 2-year survival rate in patients receiving BBP. Fresh-frozen tumor specimen were subjected to genome-wide methylation, copy number, expression and mutation analysis. A subset of the control cohort of the AVAglio study was used as BEV-negative control. RESULTS A total of 94 GBM patients were enrolled at 39 centers between June 2015 and January 2017. Efficacy analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS) cohort (N=90), excluding non-GBM diagnosis by central review. The median time to PD/recurrence was 453 days in the FAS and 348 days in patients receiving BBP (N=27). The 2-year survival rate (90% CI) was 52.4% (43.3–60.8%) and 28.8% (15.4–43.7%), respectively. The 2-year survival rate in GBM patients receiving BBP was lower than expected (50%). That of proneural and mesenchymal IDH-wt GBM in the biomarker cohort (n=83) were 52.9% (31.7–70.3%) and 56.6% (41.6–69.1%), respectively. A full biomarker analysis will be presented.

neuro-oncology

ACTR-04. BIOMARK: A PHASE II STUDY OF BEVACIZUMAB BEYOND PROGRESSION FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: SAFETY, EFFICACY AND PROSPECTIVE BIOMARKER ANALYSIS