English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

BACKGROUND Electrical properties (EPs) of brain tissue, specifically brain tumors, crucially determine the field distribution of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), an anti-mitotic treatment approved for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Due to the correlation of TTFields efficacy and field intensity at the tumor region, the knowledge of EPs in each patient is of great importance for patient-specific planning of treatment. Water content electrical properties tomography (wEPT) is a non-invasive imaging technique using water content (WC) maps obtained from rapidly acquired and processed conventional sequences to estimate the EPs of brain tissue at 128 MHz. The WC maps of this approach are constructed from two spin echo sequences similar to a T1 and a PD image. Following previous studies in rat tumor models demonstrating promising wEPT mapping of EPs in the brain at 200, this study examines the feasibility of this approach in human GBM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS For three patients of the EF-14 trial population, we divided T1 and PD images pixel-by-pixel to obtain the image ratio. Using a transfer function, WC maps were generated and maps of the electrical conductivity σ and the relative permittivity ε r at 200 kHz were calculated with two different equations. RESULTS The median value of estimated WC remains similar in healthy brain tissues among all patients, ~73.5% in the white matter, ~82% in the gray matter. The median values of wEPT-estimated σ at 200 kHz in the white matter is ~0.09 S/m and in the gray matter ~0.18 S/m, corresponding median values of ε r at 200 kHz are ~2100 and ~3000 in white and gray matter respectively. Contrary, in the tumor the spread between the median values of WC and EPs is much higher. Stating the most important findings, in the necrosis median WC are 90.3%, 92.3%, 85.2% in patients 1–3 respectively with corresponding median σ values of 0.494, 0.657, 0.25 S/m. In the enhancing tumor the spread of median WC is even higher (67.2%, 83.6%, 85.5%), yet lower spread but also very heterogeneous median σ values of 0.075 S/m, 0.208, 0.259 S/m are estimated with wEPT. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate the adaption of wEPT for mapping of WC and EPs at 200 kHz in three human GBM patients. In contrast to the vastly irregular tumor tissue, our estimations in healthy brain tissue are similar between patients and in accordance with EPs experimentally measured during our animal experiments and consistent with reported values in the literature. Hence, wEPT is a promising, fast technique based on regular MRI that might help patient-specific treatment planning of TTFields therapy, although the mapping of tumor tissue needs further confirmation in a greater population and investigations of EPs of excised tumor tissue samples should be conducted.

neuro-oncology

P11.37 Evaluating water content and electrical properties at 200 kHz in brain and GBM tumor tissue of three TTFields patients with conventional imaging