English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND Cognitive dysfunction is frequent in patients with primary brain tumor, impairing attention, memory and executive function. It compromises functional independence, decision making capacity and psycho-social well-being. Cognitive functioning is highly correlated to disease progression and quality of survival, thus cognitive follow-up is essential in the management of the disease. Cognitive screening tools are often used, since a comprehensive battery may be time consuming and challenging for patients. The objective of this study was to identify a pattern of cognitive dysfunction in patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade gliomas and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) as a cognitive screening tool in the clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS We compared performances in tests of memory, action speed, visuospatial ability and executive function of 156 patients with newly-diagnosed WHO Grade III and IV gliomas, after surgery and prior to radiochemotherapy, to those of a group of healthy controls (n=1003). Relatives assessed behavior through a questionnaire of behavioral dysexecutive syndrome. A stepwise logistic regression was performed to select cognitive domains better discriminating patients from healthy controls and we tested the sensitivity and specificity of the MOCA using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS The stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the 3 following factors better discriminating patients from controls: TMT-B completion time (OR: 0.673; 95% CI: 0.511–0.886; p=0.0005), a verbal memory index (OR:0.507; 95% CI: 0.358–0.718; p=0.0001) and a behavioral dysexecutive score (OR:0.616; 95% CI: 0.468–0.812, p=0.001). Prevalence of cognitive-behavioral impairment was of 35.94%; 95% CI: 28.3 - 43.5. The ROC curve analysis for the assessment of the MoCA sensitivity and specificity in detecting impairment yielded 0.795 (95%CI: 0.714–0.875) for the MoCA raw score, and 0.804 (95%CI: 0.727 - 0.881) for the adjusted z score. The optimal discrimination was obtained for a raw score ≤ 25 (sensitivity of 0.526; specificity of 0.832). For the adjusted score, optimal discrimination value was observed with a -0.603 z score (sensitivity of 0.716; specificity of 0.768). CONCLUSION Cognitive impairment and behavioral dysexecutive syndrome is frequent in patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma. The MoCA lacks sensitivity in screening cognitive impairment to discriminate patients from healthy controls in this setting, and a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment is still recommended.

P08.05 Cognitive impairment in patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade gliomas