Tailoring neurophysiological strategies with clinical context enhances resection and safety and expands indications in gliomas involving motor pathways
Author(s) -
Lorenzo Bello,
Marco Riva,
Enrica Fava,
Valentina Ferpozzi,
Antonella Castellano,
Fabio Raneri,
Federico Pessina,
Alberto Bizzi,
Andrea Falini,
Gabriella Cerri
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
neuro-oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.005
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1523-5866
pISSN - 1522-8517
DOI - 10.1093/neuonc/not327
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring , medicine , modalities , physical medicine and rehabilitation , neurophysiology , corticospinal tract , clinical neurophysiology , deep brain stimulation , neuroscience , psychology , surgery , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , electroencephalography , paleontology , parkinson's disease , biology , disease , sociology , social science , diffusion mri
Resection of motor pathway gliomas requires the intraoperative recognition of essential cortical-subcortical motor structures. The degree of involvement of motor structures is variable, and increases as result of treatments patients are submitted to. Intraoperative neurophysiology offers various stimulation modalities, which efficiency is based on the ability to recognize essential sites with the highest possible resolution in most clinical conditions. Two stimulation paradigms evolved for intraoperative guidance of motor tumors removal: the 60 Hz-technique [low frequency (LF)] and the pulse-technique [high frequency-(HF)], delivered by bipolar or monopolar probe respectively. Most surgical teams rely on to either of the 2 techniques. The key point is the integration of the choice of the stimulation modality with the clinical context.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom