English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity is an important cause of treatment failure of GBM. Using MRI and image-localized biopsies, it is possible to train machine learning (ML) models to predict regional genetic status. However, biopsy samples are limited, making it difficult to train a robust ML model. We proposed a data-inclusive model called Weakly Supervised Ordinal Support Vector Machines (WSO-SVM) which leverages the vast amount of MRI data outside the sparsely sampled biopsy regions to augment the biopsy samples to improve ML accuracy. Our study included a unique dataset of 104 image-localized biopsies with spatially matched multiparametric MRI from 30 untreated Glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Each biopsy sample went through genetic sequencing analysis and our study focused on two GBM hallmark genes, EGFR and PDGFRA. For each gene, a biopsy sample was labeled as “altered” if the copy number of this gene was amplified or a mutation was found, and “non-altered” otherwise. From the localized region of six MRI contrasts from T1gd, T2w, diffusion and perfusion imaging, over 300 texture features were extracted. To account for biopsy sample location uncertainty, six neighboring regions of the biopsy sample including four neighbors two pixels away from the biopsy location and two neighbors on adjacent slices were also included in model training. WSO-SVM achieved 0.83 accuracy, 0.77 sensitivity, and 0.86 specificity for classifying EGFR; 0.77 accuracy, 0.74 sensitivity, and 0.79 specificity for classifying PDGFRA, based on 10-fold cross validation. Furthermore, using the trained models, we generated regional EGFR and PDGFRA alteration maps for each patient within the enhancing and non-enhancing tumoral areas. On average we found a greater proportion of enhancing tumor with co-alteration than non-enhancing tumor, while this trend was reversed when considering only one altered gene. The ratio of EGFR vs PDGFRA alterations was higher in non-enhancing tumor than enhancing tumor.

NIMG-72. QUANTIFYING INTRA-TUMOR MULTI-GENE HETEROGENEITY OF GBM FROM MRI USING A DATA-INCLUSIVE MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM