English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Tumor heterogeneity in glioblastoma complicates delineation of active tumor using standard MR imaging. Pseudo-progression following treatment with chemotherapy and radiation (chemoRT) further complicates how tumors appear. T1-weighted subtraction maps (T1S) have been used to better identify subtly enhancing regions containing infiltrative tumor. This study examines the differences in tumor appearance between patients treated with chemoRT compared to a cohort opting out at autopsy, to understand how chemoRT changes contrast enhancement on MRI. Ten patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were recruited for whole brain donation for this study. Three patients received no treatment (chemoRT-), and seven received a combination of chemoRT and additional treatments (chemoRT+), including but not limited to bevacizumab (Bev) and tumor treating fields (TTF). Large tissue samples were taken at autopsy from whole brain samples sliced axially to align with the last clinical MRI using patient-specific 3D-printed slicing jigs. All tissue samples were hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained and digitized at 40X resolution (27 total samples). The whole slide images (WSI) were annotated to outline regions containing necrosis without pseudopalisading cells, tumor with pseudopalisading necrosis, and infiltrative tumor. T1S were created for each patient by subtracting intensity normalized T1-weighted images from T1 post-contrast images (T1C). The annotated WSIs were aligned and resampled into MRI space using a custom software. A mixed effect model was used to compare the T1S intensity between chemoRT +/- cohorts within each pathological annotation, incorporating a random effect for subject. Mean T1S intensity was greater in untreated subjects when compared to chemoRT-subjects within each pathological annotation, including necrosis without pseudopalisading cells, tumor with pseudopalisading necrosis, and infiltrative tumor (p&amp;lt; 0.001). We show that chemoRT reduces the contrast enhancement in all aspects of pathologically validated tumor compartments, including infiltrative tumor. Future research is needed to examine if other patterns are evident in additional MR sequences.

NIMG-30. PATHOLOGICAL VALIDATION OF CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT AT AUTOPSY BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED AND UNTREATED WITH CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATION