English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

BACKGROUND Currently, the standard MRI sequence for SC imaging in SBRT has been axial 2D T2-weighted Turbo Spin Echo (TSE). Even though 3D T2-weighted sequences such as SPACE (Sampling Perfection with Application optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolution) image a whole volume simultaneously and thus offer better reconstruction, they have not been clinically implemented due to their long acquisition times. However, the application of Compressed Sensing (CS) methods on SPACE sequences, achieving clinically acceptable time. METHODS A 3D T2 CS SPACE was obtained and evaluated against the standard 2D TSE for spine SBRT based on a MagPhan RT quality assurance phantom and patients data, analysis was done using the phantom manufacturer software ImageOwl that calculates image distortions by comparing the known position of phantom features to their detected position in the image. RESULTS Results of phantom comparison between 3D T2 and 2D T2 indicate that although the 3D sequence had lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than the 2D sequence, it presented less geometric distortions caused by gradient non-linearities, particularly in the anterior-posterior (A/P) and head-feet (H/F) directions. Distortions caused by chemical shift are in theory smaller for the 3D T2 CS SPACE, amounting to 0.85mm compared to 1.62mm with 2D T2. Between 2D versus 3D MRI defined SC data among 4 patients, average deviation of the centroid point cord contours was 0.08cm. The volume of the cord showed 1cc larger 3D volumes compared to 2D T2. Finally, the mean voxel count overlap coefficient and DICE coefficient was 0.92 and 0.87 respectively. CONCLUSIONS Since 3D MRI is under consideration to replace 2D MRI, it is important to compare SC contours from 3D to 2D MRI and assess their impact on treatment plans. Positive results would pave the path for larger subject cohort evaluation.

NIMG-10. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SIMULATION IN SPINE STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY