English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

BACKGROUND The optimal surgical treatment of suprasellar meningiomas remains controversial. While successful surgery has historically been measured by extent of tumor resection (EOR), surgeons must also balance tumor- and patient-specific characteristics with quality of life (QoL) outcomes when considering either an open craniotomy or endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). METHODS We conducted 28 in-depth individual interviews with patients diagnosed with suprasellar meningioma and treated via EEA (n=14) or craniotomy (n=14). We used a structured interview script and the transcribed interviews were independently coded by two researchers. Consensus was used to identify themes and domains of interest. RESULTS The overall sample (80% between 40-69 years old, 70% female, and 82% white) was largely similar between craniotomy and EEA cohorts. Tumor volumes were not different between both cohorts (p=0.2), with a combined average of 4.4 cm3 (standard error ± 0.7). Suprasellar meningiomas caused a wide range of symptoms with 21 concepts elicited. The most frequently endorsed concepts were “Vision” (n=22), “Headaches” (n=11), “Fatigue” (n=11), “Cognitive Symptoms” (n=10), “Pituitary Dysfunction – including Trouble Sleeping and Frequent Urination” (n=9), “Sinus Problems” (n=7), and “Personality Changes” (5). Both surgical approaches demonstrated improvements in vision (69.2% EEA, 66.7% craniotomy) and headaches (100% EEA, 80% craniotomy). Compared to EEA, craniotomy yielded a longer list of complications (3 vs.14) and surgery-specific symptoms (9 vs.16). More craniotomy patients reported having negative emotions (5 vs.1), new depression and anxiety (6 vs.1), financial difficulties (3 vs.1), and reduced desire/ability to pursue fun activities (12 vs.7) after surgery relative to EEA counterparts. CONCLUSION Suprasellar meningiomas can be debilitating with significantly impact on patients’ health and QoL. Our findings demonstrate differential effects upon patients’ post-operative QoL associated with type of surgery. Our findings support the need for measuring patient-centered, disease-specific QoL outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy versus EEA for suprasellar meningioma resection.

neuro-oncology

QOLP-15. QUALITATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENTIAL QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) IN SUPRASELLAR MENINGIOMA PATIENTS TREATED VIA ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL APPROACH VERSUS OPEN CRANIOTOMY