English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are an approved glioblastoma (GBM) treatment modality that demonstrated a significant improved median overall survival in newly diagnosed GBM patients. Data about morphologic changes in serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with a combination therapy of TTFields and proton boost therapy does not exist. METHODS Twenty-two patients were included in this study. All patients were treated with initial tumor resection followed by combined chemo- and radiation therapy. Radiation therapy was performed with 50.0 Gy photons and a proton boost with 10 Gy equivalent (Gy(RBE)). 11 patients were additionally treated with TTFields. RESULTS A new increase in contrast enhancement and/or a progress in the T2 FLAIR hyperintensity was observed in 54.5% (N=12) at 3 months and in 31.8% (N=7) at 6 months. No differences were observed between patients with and without TTFields therapy at 3 months [63.6% (N=7) vs. 45.5% (N=5); P=0.392] and at 6 months [27.3 (N=3) vs. 36.3% (N=4); P=0.647). By the RANO criteria a progressive disease (PD) was observed in 6 patients (27.3%) at 3 months and in 7 patients (31.8%) at 6 months. Pseudoprogression (PP) was observed in in 36.4% (N=8) at months and in 27.3% (N=6) at 6 months. Neither for PD at 3 months [36.4% (N=4) vs. 18.2% (N=2); P=0.338] or at 6 months [36.4% (N=4) vs. 27.3% (N=3); P=0.647), nor for PP at 3 months [45.5% (N=5) vs. 27.2% (N=3); P=0.375] or at 6 months [18.2% (N=2) vs. 36.4% (N=4); P=0.338] differences for patients with and without TTFields therapy were found. CONCLUSION Increased contrast enhancement and/or increased T2 FLAIR MRI hyperintensity after proton boost therapy are common. Furthermore, the rates for new contrast enhancement, PD, and PP after photon therapy with and without additional TTFields therapy are comparable.

NIMG-33. CHANGES IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AFTER PROTON BOOST THERAPY FOR GLIOBLASTOMA WITH AND WITHOUT TUMOR TREATING FIELDS THERAPY