English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

between creatinine clearance at 1 and 8 weeks after angiographybetweenthehaemodialysisgroup(n =7)andthecontrol group (n = 10) could be observed. Furthermore, two patients developed end-stage renal disease and requested permanent dialysis during follow-up in each group [4]. Finally, Reinecke et al. reported that haemodialysis after the administration of radiocontrast neither prevented contrastinduced nephropathy nor did it provide any evidence for an outcome benefit. In their large study, mean baseline glomerular filtration rates were 49 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in the haemodialysis group (n = 138) and 47 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (n = 140) in the control group [5]. From all these studies it had been concluded that prophylactic haemodialysis after radiocontrast administration does not make sense.

Does prophylactic haemodialysis protect kidney function after angiography?