English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Large-scale analyses of stellar samples comprised of cool, solar-like oscillators now commonly utilize the so-called asteroseismic scaling relations to estimate fundamental stellar properties. In this paper we present a test of the scaling relation for the global asteroseismic parameter $\nu_{\rm max}$, the frequency at which a solar-like oscillator presents its strongest observed pulsation amplitude. The classic relation assumes that this characteristic frequency scales with a particular combination of surface gravity and effective temperature that also describes the dependence of the cut-off frequency for acoustic waves in an isothermal atmosphere, i.e., $\nu_{\rm max} \propto gT_{\rm eff}^{-1/2}$. We test how well the oscillations of cool main-sequence and sub-giant stars adhere to this relation, using a sample of asteroseismic targets observed by the NASA \emph{Kepler} Mission. Our results, which come from a grid-based analysis, rule out departures from the classic $gT_{\rm eff}^{-1/2}$ scaling dependence at the level of $\simeq 1.5\,\rm per cent$ over the full $\simeq 1560\,\rm K$ range in $T_{\rm eff}$ that we tested. There is some uncertainty over the absolute calibration of the scaling. However, any variation with $T_{\rm eff}$ is evidently small, with limits similar to those above.

A test of the asteroseismic νmax scaling relation for solar-like oscillations in main-sequence and subgiant stars