English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The tension among inferences of Hubble constant ($H_0$) is found in a largearray of datasets combinations. Modification to the late expansion history isthe most direct solution to this discrepancy. In this work, we examine theviability of restoring the cosmological concordance with a novel version oftransitional dark energy (TDE). The main anchors for the cosmic distance scale:cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO),and Type Ia supernova (SNe Ia) calibrated by Cepheids form a "impossibletrinity", i.e., it's plausible to reconcile with any two of the three butunlikely to accommodate them all. Particularly, the tension between BAO and thecalibrated SNe Ia can not be reconciled within the scenarios of late darkenergy. Nevertheless, our analysis suggests that the TDE model can reconcilewith CMB and SNe Ia calibrated by its absolute magnitude ($M_{\rm{B}}$) whenthe equation of state (EoS) of DE transits around $z\sim1$. Meanwhile, we see apositive sign that the EoS transits with the inclusion of a local prior on$M_{\rm{B}}$, whereas the opposite is true without the $M_{\rm{B}}$ prior.

Can phantom transition at $z\sim 1$ restore the Cosmic concordance?