English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Far-infrared (far-IR)/sub-mm emission linked to AGN-heated dust has been atopic of contention for many years. Results have been diverse and various viewshave been presented. The empirical AGN SED derived by Symeonidis et al. (2016,hereafter S16) has more far-IR/sub-mm emission than other SEDs in theliterature, and thus it is contested by other works which argue that itsluminosity in that part of the spectrum is overestimated. Here, I investigatethis topic and the concerns raised over the S16 AGN SED. I also examine thedifferences between the S16 AGN SED and other commonly-used empirical AGN SEDs.My findings show that the reasons proposed by other works as to why the S16 AGNSED is not a reasonable representation of AGN emission in the far-IR/sub-mm, donot hold.

On the intrinsic AGN emission in far-infrared/sub-mm