Depression Screening During Pregnancy: Compliance and Effectiveness in a Military Population
Author(s) -
J Gisseman,
Tara Fletcher,
Abigail Schmolze,
Devin Cooper,
James K. Aden,
C. Bauer
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
military medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.442
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1930-613X
pISSN - 0026-4075
DOI - 10.1093/milmed/usaa509
Subject(s) - medicine , edinburgh postnatal depression scale , active duty , depression (economics) , veterans affairs , obstetrics , institutional review board , population , pregnancy , postpartum depression , military personnel , psychiatry , depressive symptoms , anxiety , political science , law , genetics , environmental health , biology , economics , macroeconomics
Perinatal and postpartum depression are common, affecting 13% to 24% of pregnant women through the first year postpartum. Depression screening is recommended by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology as an effective and low-cost intervention to improve patient outcomes; however, no nationwide screening rate is reported in the literature. This study was designed to assess the rate and effectiveness of screening in a major military medical center. Materials and methods Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained before beginning the study. The facility where this study was performed has a universal depression screening policy in which all patients should be screened using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at the initial obstetric visit, the 28-week visit, and the postpartum visit. The EPDS scores and demographic data were collected by chart review of patients seen between May 2015 and April 2017. Results Ninety-six percent of patients completed EPDS at their first appointment with a mean score of 3.8. At 28 weeks, 60% of patients were screened with a mean score of 3.8, and at the postpartum appointment, 84% were screened with a mean score of 3.5. Veterans Affairs (VA) patients and dependent daughters had significantly higher EPDS scores than active duty women and dependent wives (mean 7.91, 5.78, 3.19, 3.70, P < .0001). Eight-eight percent of patients with scores of ≥12 were offered the appropriate treatment. Conclusions First trimester screening rates are excellent; however, 28-week and postpartum screening rates need improvement. Standardization of clinic screening procedures may be necessary to increase the screening rates. Veterans Affairs patients and dependent daughters have a higher-than-average risk for depression and should be monitored closely. This study demonstrates that a universal postpartum depression screening program is an important part of obstetric care.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom