English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Fever during neutropenia is a common occurrence in children with cancer. In a systematic review of RCTs of pediatric febrile neutropenia, compared monotherapy with aminoglycoside-containing combination therapy found no significant differences in failure rates, infection-related mortality, or overall mortality. The updated pediatric-specific guidelines recommend initiation of empirical antibiotic monotherapy using an antipseudomonal β-lactam, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, or a carbapenem for pediatric high-risk febrile neutropenia. However, local epidemiology and resistance patterns should be evaluated regularly. Our local hospital epidemiology does not have Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, therefore, we used ceftriaxone as monotherapy in patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia without other risk factors. The goal of our investigation is to describe the experience of using third-generation cephalosporins in these patients. Methods Descriptive study of high-risk febrile neutropenia episodes in patients admitted to the Pediatric Oncology Unit of Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile. We included patients ≤15 years from June 2016 until November 2019. Results We found a total of 133 high-risk febrile neutropenia episodes corresponding to 50 patients, 78% were leukemia and 22% were solid tumor patients. Of the 133 episodes, 92 (69%) had clinical signs at admission, mostly respiratory in 46 (50%) of the cases, 18 (29%) had mucositis and 13 (14%) had diarrhea. Of 133 episodes, 41 (31%) did not have any source at clinical examination. Eighty-six (65%) cases started ceftriaxone at admission, 28 (33%) maintained ceftriaxone for 7 days of treatment with good clinical response. Of this group 58 (67%) patients changed treatment: 32 (37%) cases started second-line antibiotics for clinical worsening, 19 (22%) cases required second- and third-line antibiotics for persistent fever and clinical worsening, and 7 (8%) received third-line antibiotics from the start for past microbiological history. Sixteen (12%) cases of total evolved with sepsis requiring intensive care unit management. We had 30 (23%) episodes with positive blood culture, 11 (37%) due to gram-positive bacteria, 16 (53%) gram-negative bacteria, and 3 (10%) cases of fungal infections. Of the gram-negative bacteria, 7 (44%) were ESBL producers, without P. aeruginosa isolates. One case died (0.7%) for refractory sepsis due to gram-negative bacteria. Conclusion Although we did not have P. aeruginosa isolates, due to the spread of ESBL strains, monotherapy with ceftriaxone is not a good option as initial therapy for high-risk febrile neutropenia patients. The empiric therapy has to be evaluated regularly and should always be based on local epidemiology.

#43: Monotherapy Experience in Pediatric Patients with High-risk Febrile Neutropenia