English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

OBJECTIVE : To examine the classification accuracy of measures of overall psychopathology recommended for pediatric primary care screening.  METHOD : A systematic review identified relevant instruments described in the literature. Subsequent systematic reviews identified studies of sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of each measure for various cutoffs and different criteria for disorder (e.g., caseness determined by structured interview, exceeding a cutoff score, referral for psychiatric evaluation).  RESULTS : Measures include the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Brief Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional scale (ASQ:SE). For three measures (CBCL, PSC, and SDQ) studied extensively, achieving relatively high SE and SP values (≥ .70) simultaneously occurred in only 30-55% of the studies reviewed. There are relatively few studies of the ASQ:SE and BITSEA, or of relatively new measures.  DISCUSSION : Documented utility of these measures as screening instruments is limited.

Systematic Review: Classification Accuracy of Behavioral Screening Measures for Use in Integrated Primary Care Settings