English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

While scholars express a range of concerns about the use of private property to manage natural resources, an enduring counter-tradition within our idea of private property provides a principled basis for ameliorating or avoiding these concerns. This counter-tradition, the social obligation norm of property, recognises the intrinsically social function of private property and that private property can impose obligations in addition to conferring entitlements. The New Zealand quota management system for fish and New Zealand Emission Trading Scheme provide illustrations of the presence of this counter-tradition within our law. The counter-tradition also provides a way in which the concerns regarding private property in this space can be addressed, while maintaining the behaviour changing benefits private property offers.

Surprisingly Social: Private Property and Environmental Management