English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

This articles examines in detail the rhetorical means most commonly used in debates on environmental regulation. The article argues that debates on whether and how to regulate in the context of the environment often take the form of a predictable toing and froing between participants in such debates. The primary reason for this is found in the all too common reliance of participants on ready-to-hand  arguments. By way of illustration, the article makes use of debates surrounding hydraulic fracturing in the UK in the form of the recently enacted Infrastructure Act 2015. The article concludes that the reliance on predictable means of rhetorical moves runs the risk of taking place at the expense of attempts to find a constructive middle-ground.

The Rhetoric of Environmental Reasoning and Responses as Applied to Fracking