English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This paper analyses commodity tax competition between two neighboring countries whose governments are tax‐revenue maximizers in a two‐dimensional market. The results suggest three conclusions in a geographical sense. First, a small country sets a lower tax than does a big country, and per capita revenue of the small country is larger than that of the big country. Second, these two countries are subject to severer competitive pressure in the case of a more curved national border. Finally, the impact of border curvature on tax and revenue differences are always opposite in sign with the impact on tax and revenue ratios.

Two‐dimensional fiscal competition