English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Burn nurse/therapy staffing has been stretched for months by the pandemic. Along the Gulf Coast, Hurricane Ida recently taxed these resources further as regional burn centers saw a weeks-long surge in serious burn injuries in the setting of prolonged power and water outages. We reviewed the execution of a plan for the provision of burn nurse/therapist staffing at an ABA-verified adult burn center that experienced a direct hit by a Category 4 storm. Methods Hospital leadership planned to activate Code Gray on 8/29/21 at which time the hospital would be placed on lockdown with no one allowed in or out until Code Gray was lifted. Our burn leadership subsequently designed a plan to have ten burn nurses and one Occupational Therapist (TEAM A) in house from the inception of Code Gray at 7am on 8/29 thru 7am on 9/1. If Code Gray conditions persisted, nine dedicated burn nurses (TEAM B) were to relieve TEAM A. TEAM B was planned to remain in-house until 7am on 9/4. If Code Gray conditions continued, the plan was to be reassessed at that time. The same burn therapist was planned to remain in-house throughout. Physician coverage was to be provided by the in-house trauma team during Code Gray. No housing or bedding was provided for in-house personnel, and the hospital generator system ostensibly had a 30-day fuel supply. Results TEAM A day/night staffing was 6/4 with the off crew sleeping in conference rooms and clinic spaces. An unexpected event occurred when a mission-critical tower for the city’s grid toppled into a river resulting in delays for restoration of the grid, and city-wide boil-water and burn-ban policies. As generators came into widespread use, our pre-storm census of 9 increased to a mean of 12.7 + 1.4. Due to this increase, on the morning of 9/1 six TEAM A nurses elected to stay and be absorbed into Team B with day/night staffing of 6/6. The rapid influx in number and complexity of burn patients made it clear a burn surgeon presence was needed during Code Gray. One burn attending was able to make it to the hospital at 7am on 8/30 and worked until being relieved at 7am on 9/5. An informal triage strategy was enacted in which only burns of &amp;gt;10% TBSA would be considered for admission. OR availability went down to 2 + 1 at the inception of Code Gray and 3 + 1 on 9/6. Eleven cases were done during this time with a mean TBSA of 20.2 + 10.7%. Hospital generators were found to consume fuel at a rate almost twice predicted. Due to prioritization, the hospital went back on city power on 9/2. Code Gray was lifted at 7am on 9/4 and normal operations resumed at 7am on 9/11. Conclusions The successful provision of care required a willingness for nurses and one therapist to remain in the hospital for six consecutive days and for hospital administration to approve the overtime.

543 Challenges in Burn Nurse and Therapy Staffing During and After a Category 4 Hurricane