English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Three types of solid-phase chemical exposure sampling media: cellulose, polyurethane foam, and XAD-2, were analyzed for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and the amine salts of 2,4-D. Individual samples were extracted into acidified methanol, and the extracts were analyzed via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using electrospray ionization and a C(8) reversed-phase LC column. (13)C 2,4-D and a labeled benzoic acid (13)C or d5) were employed as the surrogate and internal standard, respectively. Over a three-year study of pesticide exposure among agricultural workers involving a high volume of analyses, values of average % recovery for (13)C 2,4-D on personal exposure samples ranged from 87 to 98 with a % relative standard deviation ranging from 7 to 12. The performance of the method compares favorably with that of the current National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-recommended approach for the analysis of 2,4-D on these types of exposure sampling matrices.

Quantification of 2,4-D on Solid-Phase Exposure Sampling Media by LC-MS-MS