z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
PSVIII-3 Evaluation of the Metal Corrosiveness and Pelleting Stability of Formic Acid-Based Organic Acid Blend and the Effects of the Blend on Post-Weaning Growth Performance
Author(s) -
Ying Chen,
Ana Sevarolli
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of animal science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.928
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1525-3015
pISSN - 0021-8812
DOI - 10.1093/jas/skac064.308
Subject(s) - formic acid , weaning , organic acid , chemistry , zoology , nuclear chemistry , food science , chromatography , biology , biochemistry
Studies were conducted to evaluate the metal corrosiveness and pelleting stability of a formic acid-based organic acid blend, which is a free-flowing powder with silica as inert carrier. Under experimental conditions, results suggested the blend has minimal metal corrosiveness and is stable during the pelleting process (conditioning temperature = 1950 F). An animal trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of the blend on post-weaning growth performance. A total of 1,320 post-weaning piglets (~21 d of age, 6.9 kg BW) were assigned to 5 dietary treatments (22 pigs/pen, n = 12) and fed for 42 d in 4 dietary phases (12, 10, 13 and 7 d, respectively). Treatments were 1) NC, basal diet without antibiotics or acidifier; 2) PC, basal diet with antibiotics but without an acidifier; 3) PC+A, product A is a blend of organic and inorganic acids; 4) PC+B, product B is a blend of organic acids and derivatives; 5) PC+C, product C is the formic acid-based organic acid blend. For treatments 3, 4, and 5, products A, B and C were added to the PC diet respectively at 0.3% in Phase 1, 0.15% in Phase 2 and 0% in Phase 3 and 4. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and differences considered significant at P < 0.05. During Phase 1, 2 and 3, PC+C treatment showed the greatest BW, ADG and ADFI, which were greater compared with NC (P < 0.05) and numerically greater comparing with PC, PC+A and PC+B treatments. In Phase 1, PC+C treatment showed less FCR than the other groups. There were no significant differences for ADG, ADFI and FCR among all treatments during Phase 4. Overall, PC+C treatment showed greater final BW, ADG and ADFI, which were significantly greater than NC (P < 0.05) and numerically higher than PC, PC+A and PC+B groups.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom