English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect, both in vitro and in vivo, of cefepime with those of four other cephalosporins, namely ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and cephalothin, against penicillin-resistant pneumococci. One hundred pneumococcal strains, 31 penicillin-susceptible, 30 penicillin-intermediate-resistant and 39 penicillin-resistant pneumococci, were used in MIC studies. Time-kill experiments were carried out for four strains. In the mouse peritonitis model, the dose that gave protection to 50% of mice challenged with a lethal dose of pneumococci (ED50) was determined for three pneumococci and five cephalosporins. The MICs of all five cephalosporins and penicillin correlated significantly with each other. In vitro, the most potent cephalosporins against pneumococci were cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefepime, followed by cefuroxime and cephalothin. In time-kill experiments, carried out for four pneumococci, no differences were found in the killing effect of these five cephalosporins in relation to MICs. In the mouse peritonitis model, there was no significant correlation between log(MIC) and log(ED50) for the five cephalosporins against three pneumococci (Spearman's rho = 0.39, P = 0.16). However, if the values for cefepime against the three pneumococci were excluded, there was a significant correlation for the remaining four cephalosporins (Spearman's rho = 0.62, P = 0.04). For all three pneumococci, the ED50s of cefepime were lower than expected from the MICs. It was not possible to explain this beneficial difference in the effect of cefepime in terms of in-vitro bactericidal activities, serum protein binding or pharmacodynamic parameters.

the journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy/journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy

Comparison of the effect of cefepime with four cephalosporins against pneumococci with various susceptibilities to penicillin, in vitro and in the mouse peritonitis model