English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The in-vitro activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were compared. Gram-positive cocci were most susceptible to Bay 12-8039, clinafloxacin and trovafloxacin; Enterobacteriaceae and fastidious organisms were most susceptible to clinafloxacin [corrected]; Pseudomonas spp. were most susceptible to clinafloxacin and ciprofloxacin; anaerobes, Helicobacter pylori and Campylobacter jejuni were most susceptible to gatifloxacin, clinafloxacin and trovafloxacin. Against gram-positive cocci, the only agents that were more active than ciprofloxacin were those carrying an azabicyclo (trovafloxacin, Bay 12-8039), 3-amino-pyrrolidinyl (clinafloxacin) or 3-methyl-piperazinyl (gatifloxacin) moiety at position C7.

the journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy/journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy

Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12- 8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin [published erratum appears in J Antimicrob Chemother 1998 Jun;41(6):672]