z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
LFA-1 co-stimulation inhibits Th2 differentiation by down-modulating IL-4 responsiveness
Author(s) -
Scott A. Jenks
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
international immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.86
H-Index - 134
eISSN - 1460-2377
pISSN - 0953-8178
DOI - 10.1093/intimm/dxh211
Subject(s) - stimulation , microbiology and biotechnology , cellular differentiation , priming (agriculture) , co stimulation , biology , stat protein , t cell , signal transduction , lymphocyte function associated antigen 1 , context (archaeology) , cd28 , chemistry , endocrinology , immunology , stat3 , immune system , biochemistry , cell adhesion molecule , paleontology , botany , germination , gene , intercellular adhesion molecule 1
Initial T cell activation in the context of different co-stimulatory receptors can influence subsequent lineage commitment into T(h) effector cell subtypes. Specifically, CD28 co-stimulation promotes T(h)2 differentiation, whereas leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) co-stimulation promotes T(h)1 differentiation and inhibits T(h)2 differentiation. In this report, we have addressed the mechanism of LFA-1-mediated inhibition of T(h)2 responses. We show that co-stimulation through LFA-1 does not decrease early IL-4 secretion, but rather induces a loss in IL-4 responsiveness. T cells primed in the context of LFA-1 co-stimulation require a 5-fold increase in the concentration of IL-4 required to drive T(h)2 differentiation, which is not mediated by a loss in IL-4R expression. To determine whether LFA-1 co-stimulation impacts on proximal signaling from the IL-4R, we first identified a kinetic window where we could separate IL-4-driven T(h)2 differentiation from initial T cell priming. T cells were primed for 2 days under different co-stimulation conditions and re-cultured in the presence of IL-4. Subsequent T(h)2 differentiation was absolutely dependent on addition of IL-4. Proximal IL-4R signaling, as evidenced by tyrosine phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-6 (STAT6), was not inhibited by initial co-stimulation through LFA-1, yet these T cells still required higher amounts of IL-4 and corresponding higher levels of STAT6 activation to up-regulate GATA-3 and induce T(h)2 differentiation. Thus, LFA-1 co-stimulation appears to interfere with GATA-3 expression downstream of STAT6. These results suggest that LFA-1 co-stimulation functions as a threshold modulator of T(h)2 differentiation, increasing the effective concentration of IL-4 required to drive T(h)2 responses.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom