English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background India plans elimination of HIV-Mother-to-Child-Transmission in 2020. Targets include &amp;gt;95% coverage of Antenatal-care (ANC) and HIV-testing. In 2015-16, while 43% of the estimated Indian pregnant-women (PW) received HIV-tests, one state reported &amp;gt;95% testing. Indian public-health-care is a three-tiered system from primary-level sub-centres (population-5000) to tertiary-level hospitals. ANC involves multiple-visits per pregnancy at different care-levels and data are aggregated in the Health-Management-Information-System (HMIS) at all levels. We validated (public and private-sector data from this state, for duplication in ANC registration and HIV-testing using mixed methods. Methods In the absence of guidelines for assessing aggregate-data duplication, we used mixed-methods, including surveys among 9845 PW and providers from 240 facilities in 10/36 representative districts; in-depth-interviews; case-studies and analysis of HMIS and HIV-program data (April 2015-Mar 2017). Interviews and case-studies highlighted inadvertent duplicate data-capture. Surveys quantified levels of duplication and adjustment factors (public and private-sector) were developed. Results Twenty-four% PW, visited multiple facilities for ANC, while 81% providers reported all the PW coming to their facilities as new ANC registrations (irrespective of lower-tier registration); identifying a minimum duplication of 19% (24%*81%) in ANC coverage. Twenty-nine% and 28% PW from public and private-facilities reported &amp;gt;1 HIV-test; while 75% and 36% reported visiting another public-facility where HIV test was likely to be reported again. Minimum duplication of 22% and 10% in HIV testing was noted in public and private-sectors respectively. Conclusions We report methods to quantify repeat HIV-testing and duplicate-reporting, due to inherent processes in ANC in public-healthcare in India. Modification of data-capture was recommended and adopted across India. Key messages Assessing duplication in aggregate health data is key to developing robust datasets for disease elimination

980Quantifying inadvertent data-duplication- findings from validation of antenatal-registration and HIV-testing data-sets from an Indian state