English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the context of a growing interest in comparative administrative law in Latin America, an emerging academic project asserts the existence of a “common administrative law” in the region, inspired by the so-called ius constitutionale commune in Latin America. In this essay, we examine the impact of the Baena decision (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 2001) on the administrative regimes of Argentina, Chile, and Mexico so as to reveal the limitations of such a project. We speculate that the limited impact of this decision can be explained by particular characteristics germane to administrative law that tend to be overlooked from a constitutionalist optic. Finally, we draw from our case studies to make methodological recommendations to those who want to undertake comparative administrative law studies in the region.

international journal of constitutional law

El espejismo de Baena: Luces y sombras de un derecho administrativo comparado latinoamericanoBaena’s mirage: Lights and shades of comparative administrative law in Latin America