English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

There is increasing interest in understanding the potential for epigenetic factors to contribute to phenotypic diversity in evolutionary biology. One well studied epigenetic mechanism is DNA methylation, the addition of a methyl group to cytosines, which have the potential to alter gene expression depending on the genomic region in which it takes place. Obtaining information about DNA methylation at genome-wide scale has become straightforward with the use of bisulfite treatment in combination with reduced representation or whole-genome sequencing. While it is well recognized that methylation is tissue specific, a frequent limitation for many studies is that sampling-specific tissues may require sacrificing individuals, something which is generally undesirable and sometimes impossible. Instead, information about DNA methylation patterns in the blood is frequently used as a proxy tissue. This can obviously be problematic if methylation patterns in the blood do not reflect that in the relevant tissue. Understanding how, or if, DNA methylation in blood reflect DNA methylation patterns in other tissues is therefore of utmost importance if we are to make inferences about how observed differences in methylation or temporal changes in methylation can contribute to phenotypic variation. The aim of this review is to examine what we know about the potential for using blood samples in ecological epigenetic studies. I briefly outline some methods by which we can measure DNA methylation before I examine studies that have compared DNA methylation patterns across different tissues and, finally, examine how useful blood samples may be for ecological studies of DNA methylation. Ecological epigenetic studies are in their infancy, but it is paramount for the field to move forward to have detailed information about tissue and time dependence relationships in methylation to gain insights into if blood DNA methylation patterns can be a reliable bioindicator for changes in methylation that generate phenotypic variation in ecologically important traits.

On the Use of Blood Samples for Measuring DNA Methylation in Ecological Epigenetic Studies