English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The study was conducted on a plot of ‘Washington navel’ citrus trees located at the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center’s Citrus Research Station, Port Sulphur, Louisiana. Pre-spray mite counts were made 11 Jun, and treatments were applied 13 Jun with the aid of an FMC model 100 CP airblast sprayer with an operating pressure of approximately 200 psi and tractor speed of 3rd low 1200 RPM. The study consisted of 5 treatments with 10 single tree replications from which mite counts were determined by taking 5 leaves per tree and counting the number of live mites on the right bottom half of the leaf and then doubling the count to obtain the number of mites per leaf. Once treatment application had occurred, counts were taken at 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120 DAT. When mite population built up to 10+ mites per leaf, that treatment(s) was reapplied. During this study, this occurred with the Kelthane treatment, which was reapplied 12 Jul and for both Morestan treatments which were reapplied 16 Aug. All miticide spray solutions were buffered to a pH of approximately 6.0 with the addition of Triton AG-44 M (Latron AG-44 M).

Control of Citrus Red Mite on ‘Washington Navel’ Orange in Louisiana, 1991