English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

At planting insecticide applications were made to fungicide treated wheat seed in 3 tests conducted on a Marlboro sandy loam in Barnwell County, SC. The experimental design was a RCB with 5 replicates. The experimental unit was a plot 50 x 5.3 ft (8 rows on 8 inch spacing). Hessian fly (HF) resistant varieties (Pioneer 2555, Test 1 and 2; Coker 9835, Test 3) were used to avoid HF yield effects. Granular insecticides were placed in-furrow with electric Gandy applicators. Disyston 8 was applied in-furrow with a CO2 pressurized aluminum manifold delivering 11.1 gal/acre at 25 psi through plastic irrigation tubing (1 mm i.d.). Broadcast application of Disyston 8 was made with a CO2 pressurized boom (10 gal/acre at 25 psi, Teejet 8001 flat fan nozzles) mounted in front of the double-disk openers. Fungicide seed treatments were applied by the Gustafson Seed Research laboratory (Tests 1 and 2) or by a commercial seed treater (Test 3). The NTN 33893 seed treatment was applied by thoroughly mixing a 40 ml-dilution with 6 lb of seed in a plastic bag. Stand and head counts were taken from 2 random 1-m samples per plot. Yields were taken by harvesting the middle 6 rows with a Almaco plot combine.

Baytan Seed Treatment and Insecticide Effects on Wheat Emergence and Yield, 1990-92: