English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

‘Classic Touch’ sweet corn was seeded on 31 Mar at the Wes Watkins A.R.E.C, Lane, OK. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Plots were four rows wide, on 91 cm centers, by 6.7 m long with plants spaced 10-15 cm apart within rows. Two unplanted rows between plots served as spray buffers. Standard cultural practices were used throughout the trial. Thirty primary ears from the inner 4.9 m of each plot were selected for insect damage evaluation. Treatments were applied on 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17 and 19 Jun with a tractor-mounted PTO-driven air pressure sprayer calibrated at 95.8 liters per acre, three TX-10 nozzles per row were configured with one nozzle on each side of the row directed inward at the level of the silks and one nozzle above the tassels. Ears were harvested on 22 Jun and evaluated for CEW damage by measuring the depth of penetration from the tip of the ear. Ears were categorized according to USDA standards as undamaged, marketable (no damage beyond 38 mm from tip or 12.7 cm of ear undamaged after trimming) or unmarketable (damage beyond 38 mm from tip or ears less than 12.7 cm after trimming). An average penetration depth from the tip was also calculated.

Insecticide Evaluation for Corn Earworm Control on Sweet Corn, 1992