z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Control in Field Corn, 1988
Author(s) -
D. A. Herbert,
P. M. Phipps
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
insecticide and acaricide tests
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 0276-3656
DOI - 10.1093/iat/14.1.200
Subject(s) - sowing , randomized block design , zoology , field corn , horticulture , mathematics , agronomy , biology , zea mays
This test was conducted at the Tidewater Agricultural Experiment Station farm in Suffolk, Va., to evaluate planting time nematicide-insecticide treatments for control of ECB and CEW. Treatments were applied as granules at planting time, 14 Apr, either in furrow with seed using a Noble applicator, incorporated 7-10 cm deep using a rolling cultivator gang mounted on a tool bar directly in front of the planter, or in a band directly in front of the planter with no incorporation. A randomized complete block design was used with 4 replicates. Individual plots were 2 rows (0.9-m row spacing) by 10.7 m. Twenty randomly-selected ears of corn were rated for CEW damage when ears were near maturity. Ear damage by CEW was rated on the following 1-9 scale: 1, no damage; 2, damage to ≤3.8 cm of the tip; 3, damage to >3.8 cm of the tip; 4, ≤2 side hits not associated with tip damage; 5, ≤2 side hits + ≤ 3,8 cm tip; 6, =≤ side hits + >3.8 cm tip; 7, >2 side hits; 8, >2 side hits + ≤3,8cm tip; 9, >2 side hits + >3.8 cm tip. Damage by ECB was recorded as the percentage of ear shanks bored. Whole plot yields, taken 22 Sep, were based on weight of corn with 12% moisture content.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom