English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Historical comment on the debate: embryo implantation is the rubicon for the GnRH antagonist, and answer Dear Sir, I read with great interest, firstly the article of opinion focused on antagonists and their potential effects on implantation (Hernandez, 2000), and secondly the comment of Diedrich et al. in order to classify the relationship between the result and doses of antagonist used (Diedrich et al., 2001). At the end of the reply, the authors mentioned that Caesar was cited wrongly and emphasized that the correct citation is 'veni, vidi, vici'. In order to keep the historical truth in our Journal, it is important to point out that it's a mistake. Caesar pronounced this famous sentence not when he crossed the Rubicon river, but several years afterwards in a war against the son of Farnaces, King of the Ponto (in the Turkey of today), not in Italy. The correct citation is there in the first article.