English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of triplets managed expectantly or by multifetal reduction to twins to assess the potential benefit of fetal reduction. The study design was prospective, comparative and monocentric and the study was conducted in a teaching hospital. Out of 148 women with triplets mostly obtained after infertility treatment, 83 were expectantly managed while 65 chose reduction to obtain twins. Main outcome measures were fetal loss before 24 weeks, premature deliveries before 28, 32 and 34 weeks, rate of low birthweight infants and neonatal and perinatal mortality rates. The fetal loss rate before 24 weeks did not differ between the ongoing group and the reduced group (6 versus 5.4%). Reducing triplets was associated with a significantly lower incidence of the following: prematurity before 28, 32 and 34 weeks (P &lt; 0.001), low birthweight infants whose weights were under the third centile (P &lt; 0.002) and infants whose weights were less than 1000, 1500 and 2000 g (P &lt; 0.001). Neonatal (although apparently lower in the reduced group) and perinatal mortality did not significantly differ. Our results indicate that reduction of triplets to twins is effective to improve preterm birth and fetal growth.

Multifetal reduction of triplets to twins: a prospective comparison of pregnancy outcome