English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) causes development of several cohorts of follicles. At the time of oocyte collection, oocytes are thus retrieved from a wide range of follicles of different sizes and developmental stages. A relationship between size of follicles and pregnancy rates has earlier been demonstrated. The aim of the present study was to compare fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates between oocytes retrieved from large and small follicles in conventional IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 200 conventional IVF patients and 175 ICSI patients underwent oocyte retrieval where oocytes from both large and small follicles were collected. A follicle with a volume of &gt; or = 2 ml, corresponding to a follicular diameter &gt; or = 16 mm as determined by ultrasound, was regarded as a large follicle. Only one cycle from each patient was included. Fertilization and cleavage rates were calculated per patient for oocytes from large and small follicles. The mean fertilization and cleavage rates for conventional IVF and ICSI cycles were calculated. Comparison of pregnancy rates was performed for patients receiving embryos derived from oocytes of only large or only small follicles. For conventional IVF patients, fertilization rates were 71.4 and 58.1% (P &lt; 0.01, Wilcoxon paired test) for oocytes of large and small follicles respectively. The corresponding cleavage rates were 95.4 and 93.9% respectively. The pregnancy rate for the two groups was 47% (60/127) and 15% (2/13) (P &lt; 0.05, chi2 test). For ICSI patients the fertilization rate was 72.0 and 71.1% for oocytes of large and small follicles respectively. The corresponding cleavage rate was 93.0 and 91.1%. The pregnancy rate in the two groups was 41% (46/113) and 42% (5/12). The results show that oocytes from smaller follicles also yield fertilization and pregnancies, although in conventional IVF to a lesser extent than oocytes from larger follicles. For IVF cycles, a higher proportion of immature oocytes (which are normally not included in the ICSI procedure) in the group of oocytes from small follicles is most probably the explanation for the lower fertilization rate. The decrease in pregnancy rate with oocytes from small follicles in the IVF cycles was not observed in the ICSI cycles. The possibility of evaluating the degree of oocyte maturation prior to fertilization may be an advantage of the ICSI technique. This suggests that the disadvantages of oocytes from small follicles might be overcome by means of ICSI.

Comparison of fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates of oocytes from large and small follicles