English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The recent identification of major genomic rearrangements in breast and breast/ovarian cancer families has widened the mutational spectrum of the BRCA1 gene, thus increasing the number of informative patients who can benefit from molecular screening. Numerous types of alterations have been identified in different populations with variable frequencies, probably due to both ethnic diversity and the technical approach employed. In fact, although several methods have been successfully used to detect large genomic deletions and insertions, most are laborious, time-consuming, and of variable sensitivity. In order to estimate the contribution of BRCA1 genomic rearrangements to breast/ovarian cancer predisposition in Italian families, we applied, for the first time as a diagnostic tool, the recently described multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) methodology. Among the 37 hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) families selected, all had a high prior probability of BRCA1 mutation, and 15 were previously shown to carry a mutation in either the BRCA2 (five families) or BRCA1 gene (10 families, including one genomic rearrangement). The application of BRCA1-MLPA to the remaining 22 uninformative families allowed the identification of five additional genomic rearrangements. Moreover, we observed that loss of constitutive heterozygosity of polymorphic markers in linkage disequilibrium is predictive of such BRCA1 alterations. By means of this approach, we demonstrate that BRCA1 genomic deletions account for more than one-third (6/15) of the pathogenic BRCA1 mutations in our series. We therefore propose to systematically include MLPA in the BRCA1 mutational analysis of breast/ovarian cancer families.

Genomic rearrangements account for more than one-third of the BRCA1 mutations in northern Italian breast/ovarian cancer families