English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Despite the development of advanced processing and interpretation tools for magnetic\uddatasets in the fields of mineral and hydrocarbon industries, these methods have not\udachieved similar levels of adoption for archaeological or very near surface surveys.\udUsing a synthetic dataset we demonstrate that certain methodologies and assumptions\udused to successfully invert more regional-scale data can lead to large discrepancies\udbetween the true and recovered depths when applied to archaeological-type anomalies.\udWe propose variations to the current approach, analysing the choice of the depthweighting\udfunction, mesh design and parameter constraints, to develop an appropriate\udtechnique for the 3D inversion of archaeological scale datasets. The results show a\udsuccessful recovery of a synthetic scenario, as well as a case study of a Romano-Celtic\udtemple in the UK. For the case study, the final susceptibility model is compared with\udtwo coincident ground penetrating radar surveys, showing a high correlation with the\udcomparative depth slices. The new approach takes interpretation of archaeological\uddatasets beyond a simple 2D visual interpretation based on pattern recognition.NERC doctoral training grant NE/G523798/1, and CASE sponsored by\udGeomatrix Earth Science Ltd.Peer-reviewedPublisher Versio

Successful adaptation of three-dimensional inversion methodologies for archaeological-scale, total-field magnetic data sets