English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

SUMMARY The causes of seismic anisotropy are still under debate. In particular, it is important to understand the extent to which seismic anisotropy is due to more recent geodynamic activities in the asthenosphere, or to frozen-in deformation in the lithosphere. We show that these two endmember cases can in principle be distinguished using shear-wave splitting observations from SKS waves. This is illustrated by the simple example of pure olivine with horizontal a-axis, and differing orientations of the other two axes, namely, vertical b and vertical c. The azimuthal dependence of shear-wave splitting measurements is described by two parameters, which can provide additional information about subsurface deformation. In particular, the oscillation parameter d1 constrains the orientation of foliation. We demonstrate that shear-wave splitting in the Western and Central United States indeed shows the predicted azimuthal dependence, related to a mainly subhorizontally oriented flow plane of deformation in the upper mantle. This has important implications for asthenospheric flow.

Flow plane orientation in the upper mantle under the Western/Central United States from SKS shear-wave splitting observations