English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There is a paucity of research focused on monetary incentives for recruiting dyads (participants with cognitive impairment and study partners) into research. Our objective was to evaluate if two different variations in allocating compensation among dyads changed consent rates in one clinical trial, Memories2. This trial is evaluating cognitive and functional outcomes of obstructive sleep apnea treatment in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Prior to phone screening, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (1) $200 to participant with aMCI or (2) $100 to participant with aMCI and $100 to study partner at consent visit. Allocating all the payment to the participant with aMCI yielded a 2.6% consent rate, while splitting the payment yielded at 1.7% consent rate. We will also discuss how demographic factors affected consent decision by group. This study provides insight into novel strategies that may enhance enrollment of dyads into clinical trials.

Variations in Payment Allocation to Persons Living With Cognitive Impairment and Study Partners