English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Relationship research has suggested that health among spouses is interdependent and should be considered jointly. Using data from the 2008/2010 and 2016/2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (3858 qualified couples; age=67.0±9.6), we investigated the joint influence of married partners’ individual and shared cumulative biological risk on future health outcomes. Two risk indicators were constructed to indicate biological health in different domains. Individual grip strength, walk speed, lung function, and cystatin-C were biomarkers selected to construct frailty risk whereas blood pressure, pulse, waist circumference, C-reactive protein, glycohemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol were biomarkers used to construct cardiometabolic risk. Shared risk was calculated as the number of risks the partners shared. We employed multilevel Poisson regression models to nest partners within couples and examine the effects of individual and shared cumulative risks on future functional limitations. Heckman correction was performed to correct potential selection bias. Our unadjusted models showed individual (frailty: b=0.22, p&amp;lt;.001; cardiometabolic: b=0.10, p&amp;lt;.001) and shared (frailty: b=0.17, p&amp;lt;.001; cardiometabolic: b=0.08, p&amp;lt;.01) risks are associated with greater future functional limitations. Further, shared cardiometabolic risk moderated the effect of individual risk (b=-0.01, p&amp;lt;.05). In the adjusted models, the direct associations between shared risks and future functional limitations were explained by indicators of partner selection and shared experiences. In the fully adjusted model, the cross-level interaction for frailty risk became statistically significant. The unique set of dynamics shown in our study offered new insights into understanding how couples influence one another in the context of multisystem biological health.

Examining the Impact of Individual and Shared Biological Risks on Health among Older Married Couples