English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of the study was to compare two research designs, namely the cross-sectional design and the longitudinal design, in the context of upper extremity performance and age-related changes. Upper extremity performance of 360 randomly recruited healthy, community-dwelling elderly persons was evaluated with reliable and valid sensori-motor tests. Three years later, survivors (n = 264) were reevaluated with the same tests. In many tests, cross-sectional and longitudinal designs were comparable for estimating the changes in upper extremity performance with age. However, in some tests, the decline with age using a cross-sectional design was underestimated. The upper extremity performance decline observed with the longitudinal design was larger than the decline predicted with the cross-sectional design. The withdrawal and survivor biases related to the longitudinal design and the cohort bias associated with the cross-sectional design may, in part, explain these results.

Comparison of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Designs in the Study of Aging of Upper Extremity Performance