English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The non-long-terminal repeat retrotransposable elements, R1 and R2, insert at unique locations in the 28S ribosomal RNA genes of insects. Based on the nucleotide sequences of these elements in the eight members of the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila, they have been maintained by vertical germline transmission for the 17-20 million year history of this subgroup. The stable inheritance of R1 and R2 within these species has enabled a determination of their nucleotide substitution rates. The sequence of the R1 and R2 elements from D. ambigua, a member of the obscura species group, has also been determined to enable an extrapolation of this rate over an estimated 45-60 million years. The mean rate of substitutions at synonymous sites (Ks) was 6.6 and 9.6 times the rate at replacement sites (Ka) in the R1 and R2 elements, respectively. Both elements appear to have been under selective pressure to maintain their open reading frames and thus their ability to retrotranspose for most of their evolution in these lineages. Using the rate of change at synonymous sites (Ks) as the best indicator of the nucleotide substitution rate, the mean Ks values for R1 and R2 were 2.3 and 2.2 times that of the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) genes. However, this faster rate is a result of the lower codon usage bias of R1 and R2 compared with that of Adh. When the Ks rates of R1 and R2 were compared with that of a larger number of nuclear genes available from at least two of the nine species under investigation, R1 and R2 were found to evolve in most lineages at rates similar to that of nuclear genes with low codon bias. The ability of R1 and R2 to maintain their presence in this species subgroup by retrotransposition while exhibiting rates of nucleotide evolution similar to nuclear genes suggests these transposition events are rare or not as error prone as that of retroviruses.

R1 and R2 retrotransposable elements of Drosophila evolve at rates similar to those of nuclear genes.