'Inappropriate' attenders at accident and emergency departments I: definition, incidence and reasons for attendance
Author(s) -
Andrew W. Murphy
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
family practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.955
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1460-2229
pISSN - 0263-2136
DOI - 10.1093/fampra/15.1.23
Subject(s) - medicine , attendance , accident and emergency , context (archaeology) , incidence (geometry) , medical emergency , preference , accident (philosophy) , family medicine , economics , epistemology , microeconomics , paleontology , philosophy , physics , biology , economic growth , optics
Significant numbers of patients refer themselves to A&E departments for conditions which are neither accidents nor emergencies, relatively few of which require specific hospital treatment. These patients and their conditions have been described as 'inappropriate'. The objective of this paper is to review research relating to the definition, incidence and reasons for attendance of 'inappropriate' attenders. There is no accepted practical definition of what constitutes an 'appropriate' attender to an A&E department nor of what constitutes an 'emergency'. It is therefore not surprising that there is enormous variability (from 6 to 80%) regarding the proportion of visits judged to be inappropriate. All definitions rely completely on implicit and subjective judgements to determine appropriateness. The decision making of patients in opting to attend accident and emergency departments in preference to consulting their GP is complex, involving an interplay of social, psychological and medical factors.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom