English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background The pre-participation screening is crucial as the risk of sudden death for competitive athletes is higher than that of non-athletes. In Turkey, screening could be performed at the primary health care setting both by family medicine specialists (FMSs) and by general practitioners (GPs). Although there is a guideline, there is no legal regulation for the process. The aim of this study is to evaluate the approach of primary care physicians in pre-participation screening. Methods An online questionnaire based on the Turkish Medical Association (TMA) guideline, and the 14-item Screening Guideline of the American Heart Association (AHA) was delivered to primary care physicians. Knowledge, experience and approach of the physicians were assessed. Self-confidence, application of AHA criteria, accurate referral ratios and further test requests were taken as outcome measures. Descriptive and inferential analyzes were performed and p &amp;lt; 0.05 was considered significant. Results Of 214 participants, 39.3% were women, the average age was 44.9 years, the average work experience was 7.9 years. 89.7% of the participants were aware of their authorization, 90.2% had previously given this report, but only 6.5% feels confident. Only 13.1% knows the presence of TMA guideline, and only 23.8% states being educated on the subject at any part of their career. More than 60% of the participants consider further testing necessary in addition to medical history and physical examination. Blood and urine test requests were significantly more for GPs compared to FMSs (p = 0.026, p = 0.011). Accurate referral decision ratio was only 59.3% with no difference between FMSs and GPs (p = 0.216). Work experience had no effect on any of the outcomes. Conclusions As the legal regulations and awareness of the guideline are insufficient, pre-participation screening is not standardized, and this increases tendency for further testing or referral. Key messages The pre-participation screening of athletes in Turkey is not standardized among primary care physicians. Further testing request ratio is high and accurate referral ratio is low.

Pre-participation screening of the athletes in Turkey: approach of primary care physicians