English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background The relationship between hospital volume (HV) and patient outcome is well-known evidence, and hospital volume is widely used as a quality indicator. In Japan, however, few studies are available on the associations between HV and survival after cancer surgery. This study aimed at examining the association between HV and longitudinal survival after surgeries of major cancer sites. Methods This is a retrospective observational study. Using the Osaka Cancer Registry database, we identified patients who were diagnosed as major sites of cancer (esophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, breast, and uterus cancer) between 2007 and 2011, and undergone surgeries in Osaka. To define the quartiles of HV (high, medium, low, and very low-volume hospitals), we ranked hospitals by annual surgical volume, sorted patients in descending order of HV, and assigned them into four equal-sized groups. The study outcome was five-year survival from the diagnosis. We analyzed the associations between hospital volume and survival among eligible patients aged between 15 and 84 years old, using Cox proportional hazard models. In the models, we adjusted for characteristics of patient and treatment received by the patients. Results A sample of 86,867 patients were analyzed. The mortality hazards of patients treated at very low-volume hospitals were 1.4 - 2.1 times higher than that of patients treated at high-volume hospital in all selected cancers. However, absolute differences (percent points) in adjusted survival rates between high- and very low-volume hospitals were varied by cancer site: esophagus (24.2), stomach (14.9), colorectum (11.5), pancreas (9.2), lung (10.8), breast (2.4), and uterus (3.3). Conclusions Very low-volume hospitals showed the poorest patient survival after cancer resections. Healthcare quality assessment at lower-volume hospitals and referrals to higher-volume hospitals are potential measures to improve survival of cancer patients. Key messages Patients treated at lower-volume hospitals had a higher mortality risk than those treated at higher-volume hospitals. Healthcare quality assessments and effective referrals of high-risk patients are potential interventions to improve patient survival.

Hospital volume and five-year survival after cancer surgery in 2007-2011 in Osaka, Japan