English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background A terrorist attack occurred in Paris in January 2015 against the staffs of the Charlie Hebdo magazine and a kosher grocery. This study examined psychological support given to the people directly exposed, witnesses and close relatives of those who were injured, hostages or died. Methods The IMPACTS survey was an open cohort lead in 2 waves (6 and 18 months after the events). Psychologists interviewed in face-to-face 190 civilians in wave 1. A questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics, exposure level, psychological and social support, impact on work and social functioning, and mental health disorders. Results Among the 190 participants in wave 1, 24.3% did not receive psychological support neither in 48 hours, between 2 and 7 days, and after 1 week. Among those who had received support, they had a contact in average with 3 institutions or associations. Within the 48 hours, psychological support was mainly provided by Medico-psychological emergency unit (CUMP) (45.2%). Between 2 and 7 days, CUMP (42.6%) and a Parisian hospital in specialized care unit for trauma (44.6%) had mainly offered psychological support. One week after events, psychological support was mainly provided by consultation in specialized care unit for trauma (41.4%) or in ambulatory (27.6%). Lack of psychological support was more frequent among men, unemployed, and witnesses (versus those who were directly exposed). Conclusions This study suggests offering psychological support to the whole population that have been potentially impacted, and also for those who had not been directly threatened. Long-term psychological follow-up of the most affected ones remains an objective to consolidate initial care. Main message: Psychological follow-up should be provided not only to threatened people but also to the most vulnerable people (unemployed).

Psychological support in short term after the January 2015 terrorist attack in Paris, France