English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Interprofessional teams are responsible for Primary Care at Brazilian HealthCare System. Teamwork climate is considered a key for quality of healthcare services and care perceived; it results in perceptions about a team, considering aspects that influence their relationship and effectiveness. The study aims to analyse the teamwork climate of Primary Care workers. Methods Survey cross-sectional carried out in a region of São Paulo countryside with 419 Primary Care professionals from 60 teams of public health services. We collect data through the Team Climate Inventory with 38 items and 4 factors. We analysed the data using a psychometric, factorial confirmatory analysis. This research is part of the Universal CNPq Project, process 431461/20163, and all ethical concerns were observed. Results In the sample 47 (11.2%) were nurses, 143 (34.1%) community health workers, 87 (20.7%) nursing assistants and 27 (6.4%) physicians and 115 (27,6%) other health professionals. Cronbach was &amp;gt;0,90 in all factors of Team Climate Inventory and the correlation was confirmed with p &amp;lt; 0,05. In the factor 1 - Team Participation M = 3,79, DP = 0,66; factor 2 - Support to new ideas M = 3,66, DP = 0,68; factor 3 - Team objectives M = 5,04, DP = 0,98; factor 4 - Tasks orientation M = 4,92, DP = 1,30 with p-value 0,001 to all factors. Tukey's post hoc analysis indicated that the group with less than one year in the teams (M = 5.31) had a significantly higher average when compared to groups with 6 to 10 years in the team (M = 4.91) and 11 years old or more (M = 5.04). Conclusions Results showed a good team climate in the sample, the potential to strengthen the teams and the relevance of working time together to get better results for patient health care. The magnitude of the public health impact by reporting on the team climate indicators of the 60 Brazilian teams are local and international relevance. Key messages The time of work together in a team can be a predictor of clear objectives in teamwork. The team climate recognizing can promote reinforce of the teamwork and the results to Public Health. Policy makers and managers can apply these results to build workforce management actions.

Team Climate in Primary Health Care in a region of São Paulo countryside, Brazil