English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this study was to pilot and methodologically appraise innovative patient and public involvement (PPI) evaluation tools and to describe a case study of refugee involvement in the development of mental health intervention research. 'Refugee Advisors' were involved in the development of a randomised controlled trial protocol evaluating a brief group intervention for refugee children experiencing symptoms of post-traumatic stress in Sweden. During an 8-hour research meeting, observation and questionnaire data were collected using the Active Involvement of Users in Research Observation Schedule and Questionnaire, followed by a focus group discussion. The multi-method approach demonstrated good feasibility. There were clear examples of how the advisors influenced research development e.g. recruitment strategy, cultural brokerage among study group participants, outcome measure validation. The advisors described a perceived impact on the research, equality and acceptance, and knowledge gain. A sense of appreciation and empowerment was also interpreted. However, potential issues relating to the relevance of contributions and use of an interpreter were identified.

'I felt like a human being' – An exploratory, multi-method study of refugee involvement in the development of mental health intervention research