English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo Background  Periprocedural management of patients on direct oral anticoagulants undergoing insertion of permanent pacemaker (PPM) and cardiac monitoring devices is mainly based on pharmacokinetic considerations, clinical experience, and expert opinion. Purpose  To describe the characteristics, periprocedural management, and events of edoxaban patients undergoing implantation of PPM/monitoring devices.  Methods From the global EMIT-AF/VTE registry, which includes edoxaban patients undergoing any diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, those with PPM/cardiac monitoring device implantation were observed from five days prior to 30 days post procedure. Events documented included the incidence of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis defined Major Bleeding, Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding (CRNMB), acute thromboembolic events (ATE) and perioperative edoxaban interruption times. Results   PPM or invasive cardiac monitoring devices were implanted in 136 patients. Conformance with European Heart Rhythm Association Guidance for the interruption of anticoagulation was variable: of the cardiac monitoring patients, 62.5% had interruption of treatment, whereas in PPM procedures 23.4% had no interruption. One case of CRNMB and two cases of minor bleeding were documented. All bleedings seem non procedure-related since they occurred &amp;gt; three days post procedure. There were no ATE. Conclusions Relevant complications for edoxaban treated patients undergoing PPM or invasive cardiac monitoring procedures were rare. This population of patients is apparently well managed in routine practice, but further investigation of risk factors is justified. TablePatient characteristics Parameter All subjectsN = 136 All pacemakerN = 128 Insertion first pacemakerN = 89 Change pacemakerN = 39 Monitoring deviceN = 8 Age, mean (SD)Male, n (%) 75.1 (10.1)85 (62.5) 75.0 (10.3)83 (64.8) 75.7 (9.9)57 (64.0) 73.5 (11.2)26 (66.7) 76.3 (4.3)2 (25.0) BMI, mean (SD) 27.1 (5.5) 27.2 (5.6) 27.2 (6.0) 27.3 (4.5) 25.2 (4.3) AF, n (%)‡ 135 (99.3) 127 (99.2) 89 (100.0) 38 (97.4) 8 (100.0) VTE, n (%)‡ 3 (2.2) 3 (2.3) 1 (1.1) 2 (5.1) 0 CrCL, mean (SD) 63.8 (26.4) 64.1 (26.7) 62.3 (26.2) 68.3 (27.9) 58.9 (21.8) CrCL, ≤50, n (%) 43 (31.6) 41 (32.0) 33 (37.1) 8 (20.5) 2 (25.0) HAS-BLED Score, mean (SD) 2.0 (1.2) 1.9 (1.2) 1.9 (1.0) 2.1 (1.6) 2.6 (0.5) CHA2DS2-VASc Score, mean (SD) 3.7 (1.6) 3.7 (1.6) 3.7 (1.5) 3.8 (1.9) 3.1 (0.6) Edoxaban 30 mg/day, n (%) 49 (36.0) 46 (35.9) 32 (36.0) 14 (35.9) 3 (37.5) Edoxaban 60 mg/day, n (%) 86 (63.2) 81 (63.3) 56 (62.9) 25 (64.1) 5 (62.5) AF, atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CrCL, creatinine clearance; VTE, venous thromboembolism. ‡Two patients had both AF and VTE.

europace

Periprocedural management of patients on edoxaban undergoing pacemaker and cardiac monitoring device implantation - a sub-analysis of the EMIT-AF/VTE study